<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unit Testing.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.friday.com/bbum/2005/09/24/unit-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2005/09/24/unit-testing/</link>
	<description>...so google can index my head.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:29:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluelobe</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2005/09/24/unit-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-198210</link>
		<dc:creator>bluelobe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 05:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/?p=525#comment-198210</guid>
		<description>If one is an expert in SQL and has years of experience doing SQL and has mastered SQLite in iOS, would you recommend they still move to CoreData? When I say expert, I mean, all their apps are full-featured db-wise and only use SQLite and do so quickly, bug-free, and development time is super-fast and super-efficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If one is an expert in SQL and has years of experience doing SQL and has mastered SQLite in iOS, would you recommend they still move to CoreData? When I say expert, I mean, all their apps are full-featured db-wise and only use SQLite and do so quickly, bug-free, and development time is super-fast and super-efficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: References on Unit Testing &#38; UI Automation for iOS Applications &#124; Jojit Soriano&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2005/09/24/unit-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-197453</link>
		<dc:creator>References on Unit Testing &#38; UI Automation for iOS Applications &#124; Jojit Soriano&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 02:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/?p=525#comment-197453</guid>
		<description>[...] testing is difficult for application development - Unit Testing is teh suck, Urr. by Wil Shipley + Unit Testing. by bbum - How to Write Your Own Automated Testing Framework by Gus [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] testing is difficult for application development &#8211; Unit Testing is teh suck, Urr. by Wil Shipley + Unit Testing. by bbum &#8211; How to Write Your Own Automated Testing Framework by Gus [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gin margarita via unit testing UIs &#8211; Ross Henderson</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2005/09/24/unit-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-194869</link>
		<dc:creator>Gin margarita via unit testing UIs &#8211; Ross Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/?p=525#comment-194869</guid>
		<description>[...] found it by luck, reading this post, about unit testing, which was a response to this post about testing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] found it by luck, reading this post, about unit testing, which was a response to this post about testing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lukasz Wrobel</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2005/09/24/unit-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-193140</link>
		<dc:creator>Lukasz Wrobel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/?p=525#comment-193140</guid>
		<description>While I regard writing unit tests to be controversial, I decided to write out a few most commonly encountered opinions and talk them over: &lt;a href=&quot;http://lukaszwrobel.pl/blog/unit-tests-love-ignorance-and-getting-real&quot;&gt;Unit Tests - Love, Ignorance and Getting Real&lt;/a&gt;

Perhaps you will become interested in this article, especially if you have a strong (either positive or negative) opinion on applying unit tests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I regard writing unit tests to be controversial, I decided to write out a few most commonly encountered opinions and talk them over: <a href="http://lukaszwrobel.pl/blog/unit-tests-love-ignorance-and-getting-real">Unit Tests &#8211; Love, Ignorance and Getting Real</a></p>
<p>Perhaps you will become interested in this article, especially if you have a strong (either positive or negative) opinion on applying unit tests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unit Testing: Good/Bad?</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2005/09/24/unit-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-191396</link>
		<dc:creator>Unit Testing: Good/Bad?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/?p=525#comment-191396</guid>
		<description>[...] Bumgarner counters with a good argument of when this case occurs and how unit testing can solve a [...]

[Ed:] Unfortunately, the mojomonkeycoding.com weblog&#039;s comment system is busted.  The author of that post missed the point.  If he had been paying attention, he would realize that unit testing is critical in a well designed app in that you will have a model/control layer that is a great UT target.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bumgarner counters with a good argument of when this case occurs and how unit testing can solve a [...]</p>
<p>[Ed:] Unfortunately, the mojomonkeycoding.com weblog&#8217;s comment system is busted.  The author of that post missed the point.  If he had been paying attention, he would realize that unit testing is critical in a well designed app in that you will have a model/control layer that is a great UT target.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Sweater Blog - Unit Testing Roadblocks</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2005/09/24/unit-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-188500</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Sweater Blog - Unit Testing Roadblocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 22:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/?p=525#comment-188500</guid>
		<description>[...] existing code base. I won&#8217;t go into much more about the whens and ifs, but Wil Shipley and Bill Bumgarner have delved deeper into this question, if you&#8217;re interested in reading [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] existing code base. I won&#8217;t go into much more about the whens and ifs, but Wil Shipley and Bill Bumgarner have delved deeper into this question, if you&#8217;re interested in reading [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sander&#8217;s Weblog &#187; Unit Testing Not Necessarily teh suck</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2005/09/24/unit-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-184299</link>
		<dc:creator>Sander&#8217;s Weblog &#187; Unit Testing Not Necessarily teh suck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/?p=525#comment-184299</guid>
		<description>[...] course exaggerating for effect and the post is best taken in together with BBum&#8217;s excellent follow-up where he argues that unit testing made a huge amount of sense for his project, but may be less [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course exaggerating for effect and the post is best taken in together with BBum&#8217;s excellent follow-up where he argues that unit testing made a huge amount of sense for his project, but may be less [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Humphries</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2005/09/24/unit-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-143527</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Humphries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 22:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/?p=525#comment-143527</guid>
		<description>Wow, thanks. Very good post (got from linked off Wil&#039;s blog post on unit testing).
Bookmarking</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, thanks. Very good post (got from linked off Wil&#8217;s blog post on unit testing).<br />
Bookmarking</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Waltin</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2005/09/24/unit-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-134530</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Waltin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 21:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/?p=525#comment-134530</guid>
		<description>This is a late comment, I just found this entry (which has many good points)! Now, in response to Bill Dudney &quot;How do you debug your tests?&quot;: Given that the (unit) tests are supposed to reveal bugs in your code, one approach I will test in my current project is to appoint a &quot;saboteur&quot;. This is a person that takes a branch of the code an insert bugs to see if the tests find them!

Insert a &quot;throw new ApplicationException(&quot;This has not happened&quot;) (*) here and remove an input validation there...

This is not automatic, I know, but I guess that a good sabouteur can make a difference. Anyone tried this technique?

/Dan

(*) Unfortnunately I&#039;m not able to program Objective-C for a living, but C# is really quite nice...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a late comment, I just found this entry (which has many good points)! Now, in response to Bill Dudney &#8220;How do you debug your tests?&#8221;: Given that the (unit) tests are supposed to reveal bugs in your code, one approach I will test in my current project is to appoint a &#8220;saboteur&#8221;. This is a person that takes a branch of the code an insert bugs to see if the tests find them!</p>
<p>Insert a &#8220;throw new ApplicationException(&#8220;This has not happened&#8221;) (*) here and remove an input validation there&#8230;</p>
<p>This is not automatic, I know, but I guess that a good sabouteur can make a difference. Anyone tried this technique?</p>
<p>/Dan</p>
<p>(*) Unfortnunately I&#8217;m not able to program Objective-C for a living, but C# is really quite nice&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The End of the Long Tail &#187; To Unit Test or Not to Unit Test? That is the Question.</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2005/09/24/unit-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-85079</link>
		<dc:creator>The End of the Long Tail &#187; To Unit Test or Not to Unit Test? That is the Question.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 14:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/?p=525#comment-85079</guid>
		<description>[...] I said, &#8220;rarely a good practice&#8221;. Here an Apple developer explains when unit testing is not a waste. Appreciate the differences in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I said, &#8220;rarely a good practice&#8221;. Here an Apple developer explains when unit testing is not a waste. Appreciate the differences in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

