<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Mac Mini&#8217;s GPU (Video Chipset)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/02/28/intel-mac-minis-video-card/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/02/28/intel-mac-minis-video-card/</link>
	<description>...so google can organize my head.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bbum</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/02/28/intel-mac-minis-video-card/#comment-185527</link>
		<dc:creator>bbum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/02/28/intel-mac-minis-video-card/#comment-185527</guid>
		<description>Hmm.... somebody started the year with a big Pill O' Bitter.

(1) Don't like the GMA 950?  Buy an iMac instead.   Not that much more.   Or, if driving an HDTV, get an Apple TV.   Frankly, driving an HDTV from a Mini proved to be a disaster because of HDCP.

(2) Better than the iPod? Name it.  Name one player that has the seamless integration of music, movies, tv shows, and podcasts through a store with anywhere near the ease of use and accessibility of iTunes.   Yes, movie selection is anemic right now -- but it is better than any other service that allows playback on devices.   Or how about another music device that can also browse the web or do email via WiFi (or, in the case of the iPhone, EDGE)?

As per computer virus, yes -- the first virus for consumer computers was written for the classic Mac.   A completely and totally different architecture and operating system.   And your point is what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;. somebody started the year with a big Pill O&#8217; Bitter.</p>
<p>(1) Don&#8217;t like the GMA 950?  Buy an iMac instead.   Not that much more.   Or, if driving an HDTV, get an Apple TV.   Frankly, driving an HDTV from a Mini proved to be a disaster because of HDCP.</p>
<p>(2) Better than the iPod? Name it.  Name one player that has the seamless integration of music, movies, tv shows, and podcasts through a store with anywhere near the ease of use and accessibility of iTunes.   Yes, movie selection is anemic right now &#8212; but it is better than any other service that allows playback on devices.   Or how about another music device that can also browse the web or do email via WiFi (or, in the case of the iPhone, EDGE)?</p>
<p>As per computer virus, yes &#8212; the first virus for consumer computers was written for the classic Mac.   A completely and totally different architecture and operating system.   And your point is what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/02/28/intel-mac-minis-video-card/#comment-185526</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/02/28/intel-mac-minis-video-card/#comment-185526</guid>
		<description>2008.

2 Years on and they're still using the crappy GMA 950.
They used the money they saved to spend 400 million on advertising last year.

Now that Macs are PC's, how will they justify overprice inferior products? By spending 800 million this year.

Sidenote: There are 2 major brands of mp3 player that are much better than ipod (in terms of sound quality and more) and yet a huge marketing spend seemed to cure that so it seems to be working.

Sidenote 2: Apparently the 1st computer virus was written on a mac yet expensive marketing makes us think that macs are less prone to viruses.

I LOVE MACS but I have now seen the light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2008.</p>
<p>2 Years on and they&#8217;re still using the crappy GMA 950.<br />
They used the money they saved to spend 400 million on advertising last year.</p>
<p>Now that Macs are PC&#8217;s, how will they justify overprice inferior products? By spending 800 million this year.</p>
<p>Sidenote: There are 2 major brands of mp3 player that are much better than ipod (in terms of sound quality and more) and yet a huge marketing spend seemed to cure that so it seems to be working.</p>
<p>Sidenote 2: Apparently the 1st computer virus was written on a mac yet expensive marketing makes us think that macs are less prone to viruses.</p>
<p>I LOVE MACS but I have now seen the light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbum</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/02/28/intel-mac-minis-video-card/#comment-185463</link>
		<dc:creator>bbum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/02/28/intel-mac-minis-video-card/#comment-185463</guid>
		<description>Sounds like [hopefully] a dirty connector or bad cable.

Or, pessimistically, it sounds like the GPU is potentially overheating and misbehaving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like [hopefully] a dirty connector or bad cable.</p>
<p>Or, pessimistically, it sounds like the GPU is potentially overheating and misbehaving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JE</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/02/28/intel-mac-minis-video-card/#comment-185462</link>
		<dc:creator>JE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/02/28/intel-mac-minis-video-card/#comment-185462</guid>
		<description>i have a mac mini display problem, that maybe is worth mentioning....it's a solo, and was my media center for 9 months and perfect. didn't do a ton of hd, and ran it through my hdmi cabele. now in the last 3 months i have red pixelazation, and i can't figure out why......it happens in gradations of things, in video and even in the front row menu....

any ideas?

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have a mac mini display problem, that maybe is worth mentioning&#8230;.it&#8217;s a solo, and was my media center for 9 months and perfect. didn&#8217;t do a ton of hd, and ran it through my hdmi cabele. now in the last 3 months i have red pixelazation, and i can&#8217;t figure out why&#8230;&#8230;it happens in gradations of things, in video and even in the front row menu&#8230;.</p>
<p>any ideas?</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbum</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/02/28/intel-mac-minis-video-card/#comment-134323</link>
		<dc:creator>bbum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 07:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/02/28/intel-mac-minis-video-card/#comment-134323</guid>
		<description>Not late at all and this is exactly why I don't shut off comments on older posts.   

If you happen to read this, THANK YOU for the additional info.  Very much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not late at all and this is exactly why I don&#8217;t shut off comments on older posts.   </p>
<p>If you happen to read this, THANK YOU for the additional info.  Very much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No No</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/02/28/intel-mac-minis-video-card/#comment-134318</link>
		<dc:creator>No No</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 06:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/02/28/intel-mac-minis-video-card/#comment-134318</guid>
		<description>JCR said "the TV apparently can’t take 1080p over the HDMI ports for some reason".  More details: My Sony KDL-40XBR2 (1080p LCD TV), when connected with a DVI-&#62;HDMI cable (bought at Radio Snack) will only show 1920x1080 *interlaced* in System Preferences/Displays.  However, if you hook the Sony-supplied VGA (HD15) cable to the "PC" input on the Sony TV (and Apple's supplied DVI-&#62;VGA converter wedge), it shows 1920x1080, without the "interlaced" notation!  Seems backward to me, i.e. the HDMI connectioni should perform better.  But the PC input is rock solid, and looks better than interlaced HDMI input, which chews on the fonts while deinterlacing.

(Note to anybody who nevertheless chooses to use the HDMI input: Unless you want to turn off the "overscan" option on the Mac Mini (thus leaving a black border on-screen), you must tell the Sony TV to use "Full Pixel" mode on the HDMI input, else it will chop off the edges.  And because 1920x1080(interlaced) looks so bad, you really have to choose 1600x900 to use the HDMI input.  Looks great, but you get more screen real estate the other way.  Also, though you can edit the HDMI source name label to "Mac Mini", the VGA input is hardwired to be called "PC".  Cope...)

I know this comment is way late, but the next person who Googles "mac mini won't display 1080p" will at least get a little more help here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JCR said &#8220;the TV apparently can’t take 1080p over the HDMI ports for some reason&#8221;.  More details: My Sony KDL-40XBR2 (1080p LCD TV), when connected with a DVI-&gt;HDMI cable (bought at Radio Snack) will only show 1920&#215;1080 *interlaced* in System Preferences/Displays.  However, if you hook the Sony-supplied VGA (HD15) cable to the &#8220;PC&#8221; input on the Sony TV (and Apple&#8217;s supplied DVI-&gt;VGA converter wedge), it shows 1920&#215;1080, without the &#8220;interlaced&#8221; notation!  Seems backward to me, i.e. the HDMI connectioni should perform better.  But the PC input is rock solid, and looks better than interlaced HDMI input, which chews on the fonts while deinterlacing.</p>
<p>(Note to anybody who nevertheless chooses to use the HDMI input: Unless you want to turn off the &#8220;overscan&#8221; option on the Mac Mini (thus leaving a black border on-screen), you must tell the Sony TV to use &#8220;Full Pixel&#8221; mode on the HDMI input, else it will chop off the edges.  And because 1920&#215;1080(interlaced) looks so bad, you really have to choose 1600&#215;900 to use the HDMI input.  Looks great, but you get more screen real estate the other way.  Also, though you can edit the HDMI source name label to &#8220;Mac Mini&#8221;, the VGA input is hardwired to be called &#8220;PC&#8221;.  Cope&#8230;)</p>
<p>I know this comment is way late, but the next person who Googles &#8220;mac mini won&#8217;t display 1080p&#8221; will at least get a little more help here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/02/28/intel-mac-minis-video-card/#comment-1212</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/02/28/intel-mac-minis-video-card/#comment-1212</guid>
		<description>Yet another person thinking the solution to the poor gfx problem in the mini, is to get an iMac :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another person thinking the solution to the poor gfx problem in the mini, is to get an iMac <img src='http://www.friday.com/bbum/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/02/28/intel-mac-minis-video-card/#comment-1118</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 08:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/02/28/intel-mac-minis-video-card/#comment-1118</guid>
		<description>I have a theory why people get irate about the Mac Mini GPU.  It's because everyone is out looking for the best "deal".  They want maximum bang for their buck.  What Apple has gone and done is snatched a the "perfect" deal right out of their hands.  If they had just tossed in a middle of the road 128mb video card in there then their dreams would have been made reality.  Instead, they took the perfect machine and castrated / spayed / neutered it.  (pick your term)  There is no hope even of buying a Mini and upgrading the graphics on it.  They are forced (cruelly and maliciously) to choose a machine farther up the product line (by the evil Apple).

Now, I have a Mac Mini Core Duo here serving up my text to you now.  I love it.  I love the fact that I get full operation of Core Image and I can run my 1600 x 1200 display without maxing out the video memory buffer like the old Mini would have done.  The only thing I don't like about it at the moment is that I am bumping into the 512MB ram limit constantly, and I'm used to opening up a mitfull of apps and work on them simultaneously.  Other than that, this thing is waaay faster than my old powerbook G4 1.5ghz.  It is jaw dropping.  I'm thrilled.

I can definitely sympathize with those that don't like the GPU.  I feel the pain, but I know that I don't NEED anything more than this.  It fits.

Now, I think that those who are railing against the GPU might want to sit back and marvel at the marketing pefection that Apple is crafting.  It's like an upward slippery slope.  There has to be limitations to make you want to go up to the next step:

Not satisfied with the Core Solo.. gotta get the Core Duo... 
Not satisfied with the GPU... gota go with an iMac...
C'mon 17 inches is so .. early 2000's!  I have to at least get 20.
20 inches.. yeah.. Oh, but just a couple more bucks and I've got a 2.xGhz! ...
Oh.. but wait, I can't lug that thing around...
Hey. MACBOOK PRO!!
Oh.. but not 1.8ghz....  ... that's not even 2!

It's a totally natural progression of desire.  I suspect that most people who drool over Mac updates tend to settle their desires there on the MacBook.  Brilliant.  Across the line there are no competing products, each different level /category has only one product with the "low end" and the "high end" models.  Focussed like a laser.

Anyway, if you want total control to get a computer to fit your precise, unique, tastes and desires... don't look to Apple.  It's impossible to be both focussed and diffuse.

And don't expect any business to come along and hand you the perfect deal.  The economy doesn't work that way.  Why waste your time searching for it?  It's not on eBay, Amazon, PriceGrabber, the flea market,  It's not there because all of those people are looking to get the perfect deal from YOU.

Now, if I can just find me 2GB of RAM for my Mini for under $200 THEN I'll be happy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a theory why people get irate about the Mac Mini GPU.  It&#8217;s because everyone is out looking for the best &#8220;deal&#8221;.  They want maximum bang for their buck.  What Apple has gone and done is snatched a the &#8220;perfect&#8221; deal right out of their hands.  If they had just tossed in a middle of the road 128mb video card in there then their dreams would have been made reality.  Instead, they took the perfect machine and castrated / spayed / neutered it.  (pick your term)  There is no hope even of buying a Mini and upgrading the graphics on it.  They are forced (cruelly and maliciously) to choose a machine farther up the product line (by the evil Apple).</p>
<p>Now, I have a Mac Mini Core Duo here serving up my text to you now.  I love it.  I love the fact that I get full operation of Core Image and I can run my 1600 x 1200 display without maxing out the video memory buffer like the old Mini would have done.  The only thing I don&#8217;t like about it at the moment is that I am bumping into the 512MB ram limit constantly, and I&#8217;m used to opening up a mitfull of apps and work on them simultaneously.  Other than that, this thing is waaay faster than my old powerbook G4 1.5ghz.  It is jaw dropping.  I&#8217;m thrilled.</p>
<p>I can definitely sympathize with those that don&#8217;t like the GPU.  I feel the pain, but I know that I don&#8217;t NEED anything more than this.  It fits.</p>
<p>Now, I think that those who are railing against the GPU might want to sit back and marvel at the marketing pefection that Apple is crafting.  It&#8217;s like an upward slippery slope.  There has to be limitations to make you want to go up to the next step:</p>
<p>Not satisfied with the Core Solo.. gotta get the Core Duo&#8230;<br />
Not satisfied with the GPU&#8230; gota go with an iMac&#8230;<br />
C&#8217;mon 17 inches is so .. early 2000&#8217;s!  I have to at least get 20.<br />
20 inches.. yeah.. Oh, but just a couple more bucks and I&#8217;ve got a 2.xGhz! &#8230;<br />
Oh.. but wait, I can&#8217;t lug that thing around&#8230;<br />
Hey. MACBOOK PRO!!<br />
Oh.. but not 1.8ghz&#8230;.  &#8230; that&#8217;s not even 2!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a totally natural progression of desire.  I suspect that most people who drool over Mac updates tend to settle their desires there on the MacBook.  Brilliant.  Across the line there are no competing products, each different level /category has only one product with the &#8220;low end&#8221; and the &#8220;high end&#8221; models.  Focussed like a laser.</p>
<p>Anyway, if you want total control to get a computer to fit your precise, unique, tastes and desires&#8230; don&#8217;t look to Apple.  It&#8217;s impossible to be both focussed and diffuse.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t expect any business to come along and hand you the perfect deal.  The economy doesn&#8217;t work that way.  Why waste your time searching for it?  It&#8217;s not on eBay, Amazon, PriceGrabber, the flea market,  It&#8217;s not there because all of those people are looking to get the perfect deal from YOU.</p>
<p>Now, if I can just find me 2GB of RAM for my Mini for under $200 THEN I&#8217;ll be happy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In-side &#187; links for 2006-03-02</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/02/28/intel-mac-minis-video-card/#comment-1064</link>
		<dc:creator>In-side &#187; links for 2006-03-02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 06:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/02/28/intel-mac-minis-video-card/#comment-1064</guid>
		<description>[...] bbum’s weblog-o-mat » Blog Archive » Intel Mac Mini’s Video Card bbum&#8217;s take on the Mac Mini&#8217;s GMA950 chipset (tags: mac macmini mini gma950 bbum intel video front_row) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bbum’s weblog-o-mat » Blog Archive » Intel Mac Mini’s Video Card bbum&#8217;s take on the Mac Mini&#8217;s GMA950 chipset (tags: mac macmini mini gma950 bbum intel video front_row) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/02/28/intel-mac-minis-video-card/#comment-1043</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 14:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/02/28/intel-mac-minis-video-card/#comment-1043</guid>
		<description>I've read a whole bunch of intemperate stuff posted here. A Krapfen seems particularly worked up about 3d performance.

I have bought several mac minis. None of them do *any* complex 3d stuff at all, some are headless tiny servers (scripts and command-line tools ahoy!) some are attached to TVs for home theater, some are workstations. For my purposes, the new minis are a HUGE WIN. The older ones were better for you? Buy them on ebay as people like me upgrade.

You seem to have forgotten that there are a lot of us who are much better off. Not that it means that you shouldn't be unhappy that you're worse off. But Apple's market research is might have led them to some trade-offs which suit a lot more people than you think.

Or, to put it another way, why should I pay an extra $50 for something I'll never use so that you can get an extra 4fps in a UT? Answers, questions, comments are more than welcome :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read a whole bunch of intemperate stuff posted here. A Krapfen seems particularly worked up about 3d performance.</p>
<p>I have bought several mac minis. None of them do *any* complex 3d stuff at all, some are headless tiny servers (scripts and command-line tools ahoy!) some are attached to TVs for home theater, some are workstations. For my purposes, the new minis are a HUGE WIN. The older ones were better for you? Buy them on ebay as people like me upgrade.</p>
<p>You seem to have forgotten that there are a lot of us who are much better off. Not that it means that you shouldn&#8217;t be unhappy that you&#8217;re worse off. But Apple&#8217;s market research is might have led them to some trade-offs which suit a lot more people than you think.</p>
<p>Or, to put it another way, why should I pay an extra $50 for something I&#8217;ll never use so that you can get an extra 4fps in a UT? Answers, questions, comments are more than welcome <img src='http://www.friday.com/bbum/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
