<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Xcode 2.3 is now available.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/05/23/xcode-23-is-now-available/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/05/23/xcode-23-is-now-available/</link>
	<description>...so google can index my head.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:34:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/05/23/xcode-23-is-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-5631</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 22:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/05/23/xcode-23-is-now-available/#comment-5631</guid>
		<description>Somehow this changed the behavior of Build&amp;Run for WO projects.  Had to turn of continue after error (which used to have to be on to continue after the first error) as it now runs the executable even if an error happens during a build.  Why would there ever be a switch that would enable running a previous executable after this build failed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow this changed the behavior of Build&amp;Run for WO projects.  Had to turn of continue after error (which used to have to be on to continue after the first error) as it now runs the executable even if an error happens during a build.  Why would there ever be a switch that would enable running a previous executable after this build failed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/05/23/xcode-23-is-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-5047</link>
		<dc:creator>robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 18:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/05/23/xcode-23-is-now-available/#comment-5047</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure the built-in software update mechanism could handle the dev tools update as the most efficient and secure way to install a new version of the tools is to run the uninstall perl script. This avoids all the bugs and glitches you are talking about and which are reported from times to times on the xcode mailing list.

What could be interesting from Apple would be to provide more detailed update information without having to install the new version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure the built-in software update mechanism could handle the dev tools update as the most efficient and secure way to install a new version of the tools is to run the uninstall perl script. This avoids all the bugs and glitches you are talking about and which are reported from times to times on the xcode mailing list.</p>
<p>What could be interesting from Apple would be to provide more detailed update information without having to install the new version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/05/23/xcode-23-is-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-5045</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 15:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/05/23/xcode-23-is-now-available/#comment-5045</guid>
		<description>Personally - I will take full installs and larger downloads over patches that may or may not work completely correct - any day of the week. This is software development tools we are talking about. We don&#039;t need more bugs or glitches.

Of course I only install the combo Mac OS X Updates also, so it might just be me..

With that said, it would be nice if the built in software update handled development tools, and documentation updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally &#8211; I will take full installs and larger downloads over patches that may or may not work completely correct &#8211; any day of the week. This is software development tools we are talking about. We don&#8217;t need more bugs or glitches.</p>
<p>Of course I only install the combo Mac OS X Updates also, so it might just be me..</p>
<p>With that said, it would be nice if the built in software update handled development tools, and documentation updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/05/23/xcode-23-is-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-5034</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 04:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/05/23/xcode-23-is-now-available/#comment-5034</guid>
		<description>915 megs! Haven&#039;t you guys ever heard of, you know, patches?
&lt;/grumble&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>915 megs! Haven&#8217;t you guys ever heard of, you know, patches?<br />
&lt;/grumble&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/05/23/xcode-23-is-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-4832</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 23:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/05/23/xcode-23-is-now-available/#comment-4832</guid>
		<description>I know you probably can&#039;t do anything about it, but it would be nice if Apple provided a torrent, it&#039;s looking like it will take over 2 hours for me to get the download (and I&#039;m no where near maxing my connection). It would also be nice if it didn&#039;t require an ADC login to download, as it makes it slightly more annoying to install on remote machines, but that&#039;s really a minor issue (and something I doubt will change).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know you probably can&#8217;t do anything about it, but it would be nice if Apple provided a torrent, it&#8217;s looking like it will take over 2 hours for me to get the download (and I&#8217;m no where near maxing my connection). It would also be nice if it didn&#8217;t require an ADC login to download, as it makes it slightly more annoying to install on remote machines, but that&#8217;s really a minor issue (and something I doubt will change).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xcode 2.3 at fusion94.org</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/05/23/xcode-23-is-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-4831</link>
		<dc:creator>Xcode 2.3 at fusion94.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 22:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/05/23/xcode-23-is-now-available/#comment-4831</guid>
		<description>[...] Bill Bumgarner describes it as such: The key here is the new distributed build subsystem called Dedicated Network Builds. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bill Bumgarner describes it as such: The key here is the new distributed build subsystem called Dedicated Network Builds. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
