<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blue-gill (common pond fish) as water quality monitors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/09/21/blue-gill-common-pond-fish-as-water-quality-monitors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/09/21/blue-gill-common-pond-fish-as-water-quality-monitors/</link>
	<description>...so google can index my head.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:42:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fly in fishing</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/09/21/blue-gill-common-pond-fish-as-water-quality-monitors/comment-page-1/#comment-190195</link>
		<dc:creator>fly in fishing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/09/21/blue-gill-common-pond-fish-as-water-quality-monitors/#comment-190195</guid>
		<description>Blue gill are fun to catch and delicious no doubt about it. I never heard of using them for a water quality indicator before though.

It&#039;s funny how many people aren&#039;t interested in catching bluegill. I throw bass back because I&#039;d rather not eat them, not to mention my kids might catch the same fish some day wehn it&#039;s even bigger.

The female bluegill are the less brighter colored fish. After you catch a few you will notice some are very bright and other are a little less colorful. Releasing the female bluegill helps keep the population on the up. Throwing back large females also helps strengthen the genetics of the larger fish. Keeping all the big fish and throwing back all the small fish strengthens the small gene and this is why many lakes have almost all small bluegill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blue gill are fun to catch and delicious no doubt about it. I never heard of using them for a water quality indicator before though.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny how many people aren&#8217;t interested in catching bluegill. I throw bass back because I&#8217;d rather not eat them, not to mention my kids might catch the same fish some day wehn it&#8217;s even bigger.</p>
<p>The female bluegill are the less brighter colored fish. After you catch a few you will notice some are very bright and other are a little less colorful. Releasing the female bluegill helps keep the population on the up. Throwing back large females also helps strengthen the genetics of the larger fish. Keeping all the big fish and throwing back all the small fish strengthens the small gene and this is why many lakes have almost all small bluegill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbum</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/09/21/blue-gill-common-pond-fish-as-water-quality-monitors/comment-page-1/#comment-31894</link>
		<dc:creator>bbum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/09/21/blue-gill-common-pond-fish-as-water-quality-monitors/#comment-31894</guid>
		<description>Did you actually read the post?   Do you understand the words within?   Clearly not.   I understand exactly how dangerous the world is and I&#039;m irritated that the government -- really, in this case, the press -- is perpetuating fear of a threat that is extremely minor compared to actual threats.

Let me try to break it down into simple terms:

(1) Tainted water supplies have been a problem forever.

(2) Most of the problem is either natural agents -- algae blooms, rot, etc...

(3) In the past 100 years, unintentional man-made contamination has become more of a problem.  Pesticides.  Fertilizer.  The like.

(4) Poisoning a water supply requires an ungodly huge amount of material.  Trucks full.   That terrorists might do so is a hollywood scenario.   It hasn&#039;t happened in the real world (that I could find) because it just isn&#039;t practical.

(5) The definition of terrorist is &quot;a  person who uses terrorism in the pursuit of political aims.&quot;

(6) The definition of terrorism is &quot;the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims&quot;.

Conclusion:  The fish are there to protect against (2) and (3), not (4).   The chances of (4) happening are fleetingly small.  (2) and (3) happen every year around the country.

Now, read (6) carefully.   See the word &quot;intimidation&quot;.  The press and the government&#039;s constant stream of fear mongering stories intimidates the population.  It creates fear -- terror -- and therefore, perpetuates the terrorist cause.

There are legitimate reasons to be fearful these days.  Certainly.   Perptuating fear of scenarios that have never happened anywhere but in Hollywood or Simpsons cartoons is irresponsible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you actually read the post?   Do you understand the words within?   Clearly not.   I understand exactly how dangerous the world is and I&#8217;m irritated that the government &#8212; really, in this case, the press &#8212; is perpetuating fear of a threat that is extremely minor compared to actual threats.</p>
<p>Let me try to break it down into simple terms:</p>
<p>(1) Tainted water supplies have been a problem forever.</p>
<p>(2) Most of the problem is either natural agents &#8212; algae blooms, rot, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>(3) In the past 100 years, unintentional man-made contamination has become more of a problem.  Pesticides.  Fertilizer.  The like.</p>
<p>(4) Poisoning a water supply requires an ungodly huge amount of material.  Trucks full.   That terrorists might do so is a hollywood scenario.   It hasn&#8217;t happened in the real world (that I could find) because it just isn&#8217;t practical.</p>
<p>(5) The definition of terrorist is &#8220;a  person who uses terrorism in the pursuit of political aims.&#8221;</p>
<p>(6) The definition of terrorism is &#8220;the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims&#8221;.</p>
<p>Conclusion:  The fish are there to protect against (2) and (3), not (4).   The chances of (4) happening are fleetingly small.  (2) and (3) happen every year around the country.</p>
<p>Now, read (6) carefully.   See the word &#8220;intimidation&#8221;.  The press and the government&#8217;s constant stream of fear mongering stories intimidates the population.  It creates fear &#8212; terror &#8212; and therefore, perpetuates the terrorist cause.</p>
<p>There are legitimate reasons to be fearful these days.  Certainly.   Perptuating fear of scenarios that have never happened anywhere but in Hollywood or Simpsons cartoons is irresponsible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neo</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/09/21/blue-gill-common-pond-fish-as-water-quality-monitors/comment-page-1/#comment-31800</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 06:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/09/21/blue-gill-common-pond-fish-as-water-quality-monitors/#comment-31800</guid>
		<description>I guess the government will stop &quot;perpetuating the terrorist cause&quot; when there are no more terrorists trying to kill peace-loving family guys who like to eat sunfish and are utterly ignorant to how dangerous the entire rest of the world outside of the Left-Coast Bay Area *really* is (and has been, long before the United States or even George W. Bush was elected, twice).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the government will stop &#8220;perpetuating the terrorist cause&#8221; when there are no more terrorists trying to kill peace-loving family guys who like to eat sunfish and are utterly ignorant to how dangerous the entire rest of the world outside of the Left-Coast Bay Area *really* is (and has been, long before the United States or even George W. Bush was elected, twice).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/09/21/blue-gill-common-pond-fish-as-water-quality-monitors/comment-page-1/#comment-26265</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 05:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/09/21/blue-gill-common-pond-fish-as-water-quality-monitors/#comment-26265</guid>
		<description>Mmmmm..... blue-gill! When&#039;s the fish fry? I also love it when neighbors show up at the door... &quot;Y&#039;all want some fish? We caught more than we can eat tonite, and we don&#039;t have room in the freezer.&quot; &lt;i&gt;Almost&lt;/i&gt; as good as catching them yourself. I wonder if the local, but widely-known local hatchery, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kens-fishfarm.com/Default.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ken&#039;s Fish Hatchery&lt;/a&gt; is in on any of this water quality stuff. Yeah, this is the place where the Hogzilla story originated last year. But they do have some huge hybrid bream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmmmm&#8230;.. blue-gill! When&#8217;s the fish fry? I also love it when neighbors show up at the door&#8230; &#8220;Y&#8217;all want some fish? We caught more than we can eat tonite, and we don&#8217;t have room in the freezer.&#8221; <i>Almost</i> as good as catching them yourself. I wonder if the local, but widely-known local hatchery, <a href="http://www.kens-fishfarm.com/Default.asp" >Ken&#8217;s Fish Hatchery</a> is in on any of this water quality stuff. Yeah, this is the place where the Hogzilla story originated last year. But they do have some huge hybrid bream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
