<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: North Korea detonates second nuke test?? (Doesn&#8217;t look like it)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/10/10/north-korea-does-second-nuke-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/10/10/north-korea-does-second-nuke-test/</link>
	<description>...so google can index my head.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:34:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/10/10/north-korea-does-second-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-31654</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/10/10/north-korea-does-second-nuke-test/#comment-31654</guid>
		<description>The data&#039;s up on the site now.
I used to work at USGS and they always said that seismo reports from close to the epicenter were less accurate than data taken from far away, and the USGS results are aggregated from the world seismo network, so they are the authority. The local results tend to be noisier and don&#039;t have enough distance to measure propagation of the wave accurately (I will spare you a lecture on the P Wave vs S Wave equations). 
I remember I used to watch the incoming data on the seismograms in my Denver office, and was always puzzled at the constant tiny quakes that would register. I finally asked someone about it, and they said &quot;oh that&#039;s just mining operations up in the mountains.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The data&#8217;s up on the site now.<br />
I used to work at USGS and they always said that seismo reports from close to the epicenter were less accurate than data taken from far away, and the USGS results are aggregated from the world seismo network, so they are the authority. The local results tend to be noisier and don&#8217;t have enough distance to measure propagation of the wave accurately (I will spare you a lecture on the P Wave vs S Wave equations).<br />
I remember I used to watch the incoming data on the seismograms in my Denver office, and was always puzzled at the constant tiny quakes that would register. I finally asked someone about it, and they said &#8220;oh that&#8217;s just mining operations up in the mountains.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morning Coffee</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/10/10/north-korea-does-second-nuke-test/comment-page-1/#comment-31433</link>
		<dc:creator>Morning Coffee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2006/10/10/north-korea-does-second-nuke-test/#comment-31433</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Norks Suspected of Second Nuke Test&lt;/strong&gt;

TOKYO (AP) &#8212; The Japanese government suspects North Korea has conducted a second nuclear test and was trying to confirm it, a government official said Wednesday.
But a South Korean official said seismic monitors did not detect any tremors that co...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Norks Suspected of Second Nuke Test</strong></p>
<p>TOKYO (AP) &#8212; The Japanese government suspects North Korea has conducted a second nuclear test and was trying to confirm it, a government official said Wednesday.<br />
But a South Korean official said seismic monitors did not detect any tremors that co&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
