<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Cause splosions are cool.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.friday.com/bbum/2007/03/27/cause-splosions-are-cool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2007/03/27/cause-splosions-are-cool/</link>
	<description>...so google can index my head.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 06:25:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magnet Schmuck</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2007/03/27/cause-splosions-are-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-189891</link>
		<dc:creator>Magnet Schmuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2007/03/27/cause-splosions-are-cool/#comment-189891</guid>
		<description>This could also be done in a manual camera using a slow shutter speed. I like the effects on the photos. at first glance, it looked like a firecracker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could also be done in a manual camera using a slow shutter speed. I like the effects on the photos. at first glance, it looked like a firecracker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blog on blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Capacitor Discharge in Action</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2007/03/27/cause-splosions-are-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-112626</link>
		<dc:creator>blog on blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Capacitor Discharge in Action</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 12:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2007/03/27/cause-splosions-are-cool/#comment-112626</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8216;Cause splosions are cool - Link [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8216;Cause splosions are cool &#8211; Link [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When You Take Apart Cameras - Discharge the Capacitor to Avoid Injury! at I Make Things</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2007/03/27/cause-splosions-are-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-95855</link>
		<dc:creator>When You Take Apart Cameras - Discharge the Capacitor to Avoid Injury! at I Make Things</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 15:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2007/03/27/cause-splosions-are-cool/#comment-95855</guid>
		<description>[...] Some people like to take photos of the sparks, Link. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some people like to take photos of the sparks, Link. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Holt</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2007/03/27/cause-splosions-are-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-93681</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Holt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 23:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2007/03/27/cause-splosions-are-cool/#comment-93681</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be very curious to learn how stress it does put on them, some measure of life expectancy and whether these are all that much worse than the normal stresses it goes through driving the flash...

FWIW: I have never had one fail, but I&#039;ve only driven any single one something on the order of dozens of cycles and I&#039;ve never yet hooked one up to the charger backward.  Also, because the charging circuits from the cameras are slow, I generally batch up a half-dozen or so charged caps, so that distributes the load as well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be very curious to learn how stress it does put on them, some measure of life expectancy and whether these are all that much worse than the normal stresses it goes through driving the flash&#8230;</p>
<p>FWIW: I have never had one fail, but I&#8217;ve only driven any single one something on the order of dozens of cycles and I&#8217;ve never yet hooked one up to the charger backward.  Also, because the charging circuits from the cameras are slow, I generally batch up a half-dozen or so charged caps, so that distributes the load as well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbum</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2007/03/27/cause-splosions-are-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-93661</link>
		<dc:creator>bbum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2007/03/27/cause-splosions-are-cool/#comment-93661</guid>
		<description>It puts a hell of a lot of stress on the capacitor.   I&#039;m sure it will eventually fail, possibly catastrophically, probably just by no longer holding a charge because of an internal short.

Given that used disposable cameras are free by the dozen (seriously -- go ask any one hour photo place for cameras... tell &#039;em you are doing a science fair project with the flashes) and there is one good sized capacitor per camera, you&#039;ll likely run out of things to zap before you run out of capacitors to zap with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It puts a hell of a lot of stress on the capacitor.   I&#8217;m sure it will eventually fail, possibly catastrophically, probably just by no longer holding a charge because of an internal short.</p>
<p>Given that used disposable cameras are free by the dozen (seriously &#8212; go ask any one hour photo place for cameras&#8230; tell &#8216;em you are doing a science fair project with the flashes) and there is one good sized capacitor per camera, you&#8217;ll likely run out of things to zap before you run out of capacitors to zap with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skazz</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2007/03/27/cause-splosions-are-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-93658</link>
		<dc:creator>Skazz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2007/03/27/cause-splosions-are-cool/#comment-93658</guid>
		<description>Out of curiosity, what does this do to the capacitor?  Can you do this forever with the same one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of curiosity, what does this do to the capacitor?  Can you do this forever with the same one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbum&#8217;s weblog-o-mat &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digicams with five second exposures?</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2007/03/27/cause-splosions-are-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-93620</link>
		<dc:creator>bbum&#8217;s weblog-o-mat &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digicams with five second exposures?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2007/03/27/cause-splosions-are-cool/#comment-93620</guid>
		<description>[...] the spark post, K asked: Are digital cameras with five second exposure times really that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the spark post, K asked: Are digital cameras with five second exposure times really that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbum</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2007/03/27/cause-splosions-are-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-93616</link>
		<dc:creator>bbum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2007/03/27/cause-splosions-are-cool/#comment-93616</guid>
		<description>Yes, quite common.  Any basic Digital SLR camera -- many of which can be had for less than $600 -- can do multi-second exposures.

If that is still too pricy for you, a quick search of DPReview&#039;s buying guide (http://www.dpreview.com -- link on left) reveals more than a dozen sub-$200 cameras that can do 15+ second exposures.   All are 4MP or greater, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, quite common.  Any basic Digital SLR camera &#8212; many of which can be had for less than $600 &#8212; can do multi-second exposures.</p>
<p>If that is still too pricy for you, a quick search of DPReview&#8217;s buying guide (<a href="http://www.dpreview.com" >http://www.dpreview.com</a> &#8212; link on left) reveals more than a dozen sub-$200 cameras that can do 15+ second exposures.   All are 4MP or greater, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2007/03/27/cause-splosions-are-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-93611</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2007/03/27/cause-splosions-are-cool/#comment-93611</guid>
		<description>Are digital cameras with &lt;b&gt;five second&lt;/b&gt; exposure times really that common?

It always pays to have lots of cash and expensive gadgets when you&#039;re making all these money-saving Make projects...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are digital cameras with <b>five second</b> exposure times really that common?</p>
<p>It always pays to have lots of cash and expensive gadgets when you&#8217;re making all these money-saving Make projects&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techzi &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Capacitor Discharge in Action</title>
		<link>http://www.friday.com/bbum/2007/03/27/cause-splosions-are-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-93597</link>
		<dc:creator>Techzi &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Capacitor Discharge in Action</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.friday.com/bbum/2007/03/27/cause-splosions-are-cool/#comment-93597</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8216;Cause splosions are cool - Link [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8216;Cause splosions are cool &#8211; Link [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
