http://www.friday.com/bbum/2008/03/15/blinking-two-leds-bit-manipulation-macros-oh-my/ ...so google can organize my head. Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:26:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 http://www.friday.com/bbum/2008/03/15/blinking-two-leds-bit-manipulation-macros-oh-my/#comment-185826 Nathan Gray Mon, 17 Mar 2008 02:27:50 +0000 http://www.friday.com/bbum/2008/03/15/blinking-two-leds-bit-manipulation-macros-oh-my/#comment-185826 Actually, binary constants have been added as an extension to GCC 4.3.0, with just the syntax you describe. :-) Actually, binary constants have been added as an extension to GCC 4.3.0, with just the syntax you describe.

]]> http://www.friday.com/bbum/2008/03/15/blinking-two-leds-bit-manipulation-macros-oh-my/#comment-185824 Ben Holt Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:33:41 +0000 http://www.friday.com/bbum/2008/03/15/blinking-two-leds-bit-manipulation-macros-oh-my/#comment-185824 Another set of macros I find useful allows you to <a href="http://www.thescripts.com/forum/thread216333.html">define binary constants</a>. With these the <code>bit_set</code> example above could be written as <code>bit_set(PORTD, B8(10010101));</code> which is the more readable version depends, of course, on the context, but they're handy to have around. (And why C doesn't support this directly as 0b10010101 is beyond me...) Another set of macros I find useful allows you to define binary constants. With these the bit_set example above could be written as bit_set(PORTD, B8(10010101)); which is the more readable version depends, of course, on the context, but they’re handy to have around. (And why C doesn’t support this directly as 0b10010101 is beyond me…)

]]> http://www.friday.com/bbum/2008/03/15/blinking-two-leds-bit-manipulation-macros-oh-my/#comment-185818 Peter Sun, 16 Mar 2008 07:49:25 +0000 http://www.friday.com/bbum/2008/03/15/blinking-two-leds-bit-manipulation-macros-oh-my/#comment-185818 Wow, some people really like to make things hard, don't they? Wow, some people really like to make things hard, don’t they?

]]>